Abstract
Background
All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA)-based regimens have revolutionized the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). While ATRA combined with idarubicin remains a frontline standard, ATRA plus gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), a CD33-directed antibody-drug conjugate, has emerged as a chemotherapy-sparing alternative. Comparative long-term data on cardiovascular and hematologic toxicities of these regimens remain limited.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX global research platform to identify patients diagnosed with APL who received either ATRA + GO (n=180) or ATRA + idarubicin (n=4,096). Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed based on age, race, BMI, hypertension, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, diabetes mellitus, malnutrition, asthma, and emphysema, resulting in matched cohorts of 166 patients each. The primary outcome was the 5-year incidence of all-cause mortality, and secondary outcomes included the incidence of acute arterial thrombosis, DIC, acute MI, cardiac arrest, heart failure, atrial fibrillation/flutter, AKI, readmission rate, acute ischemic stroke, and the incidence of secondary cancers. Risk ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and p values were calculated.
Results
After propensity score matching each cohort comprised of 166 patients. All-cause mortality was significantly lower in the ATRA + GO group compared to the idarubicin group (15.7% vs. 33.7%; RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.30-0.70, p<0.001). The idarubicin group higher incidence of cardiac arrest (RR 1.8, 95%, p=0.001). The ATRA+GO cohort experienced a higher incidence of DIC ( 19.8% VS. 6.0%, RR:3.3, 95%CI: 1.68-6.47, p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the outcomes of acute MI, heart failure, atrial fibrillation/flutter, acute ischemic stroke, AKI, readmission rate, hypothyroidism, secondary tumors incidence, isolated arterial thrombi, and deep venous thrombosis.
Conclusions
In this real-world, propensity-matched analysis of APL patients, ATRA + GO was associated with significantly lower 5-year mortality and incidence of cardiac arrest but increased risks of DIC compared to ATRA + idarubicin. These findings highlight the importance of individualized risk-benefit assessment when selecting induction regimens for APL.
Table 1. Summary of Efficacy Outcomes from Meta-analysis
Outcome
Risk Ratio (RR) [95% CI]
P-value
Heterogeneity (I²)
2-year Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
1.50 [0.50–4.50]
0.254
85.3%
PFS (Sensitivity analysis)
2.05 [1.18–3.55]
0.038
0%
3-year Overall Survival (OS)
1.00 [0.96–1.05]
0.593
0%
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
1.09 [0.81–1.49]
0.697
65.2%
Complete Response (CR)
0.78 [0.25–2.47]
0.549
82.2%
Partial Response (PR)
1.20 [0.74–1.94]
0.325
24.9%
Table 2. Summary of Adverse Events from Meta-analysis
Adverse Event
Risk Ratio (RR) [95% CI]
P-value
Heterogeneity (I²)
Neutropenia (Any Grade)
1.56 [0.22–11.09]
0.434
75.8%
Neutropenia (Grade ≥3)
1.39 [0.12–16.03]
0.620
86.9%
Thrombocytopenia (Any Grade)
1.09 [0.19–6.10]
0.855
13.6%
Thrombocytopenia (Grade ≥3)
1.71 [0.34–8.59]
0.289
0%
Anemia (Any Grade)
1.20 [0.17–8.41]
0.727
60.1%
Anemia (Grade ≥3)
2.96 [0.12–71.57]
0.504
N/A
Skin Rash
2.79 [1.08–7.17]
0.033
65.2%
Diarrhea
1.98 [1.65–2.38]
0.004
0%
Fatigue
1.09 [0.40–2.99]
0.747
79.6%
Nausea/Vomiting
0.91 [0.14–5.80]
0.844
83.3%
Elevated Aminotransferases
1.00 [0.03–31.60]
0.997
11.3%